※ 引述《yochiya (漂浮)》之銘言： : https://x.com/HeatCulture13/status/2011569364877574432 : Rich Paul回應他之前關於「用Austin Reaves交易Jaren Jackson Jr」的說法 : ，而Max Kellerman(資深評論員，富保羅的podcast搭檔)則表示湖人需要交易Luka。 : Rich Paul： : 我跟我的朋友Reggie(AR的經紀人）聊過，我跟他說:聽著Reggie，你是我兄弟，我希望 : Austin知道，這件事完全不是針對Austin Reaves，因為我很愛這名球員，也很喜歡這個 : 人。第二，我其實還需要他幫我提升高爾夫球技，我不想搞砸任何和AR有關的事情。 : 這只是一個假設性的觀點，並不是什麼真的會發生的事。再者，我反而覺得這對AR是一 : 種肯定，因為他在一支擁有兩位未來名人堂球員的球隊裡，而他被視為「資產」。 : 我真的不是想影響AR的任何事情！ : Max Kellerman:如果我是湖人，我會非常認真地考慮把Luka交易掉。 https://open.spotify.com/episode/5NdC2FrRObPcIJW4NrOeVx 28:14開始 補充後面的內容 Max: Unless you want to move Luka. Like, you know, we all know the reality. Look, honestly, who would you rather do if you were the Lakers and Box Office is not trying to get them all in? 除非你想動 Luka。大家都知道現實狀況。老實說，如果你是湖人，而你並不打算把這兩 個人（Luka 和 Reaves）都留著的話，你會選誰？ Rich: No. No, you're not. You're not going to do that, Max 不、不，Max。你不能那樣(釣) Max: Okay, let me say what I would do. If I were the Lakers, I would give serious consideration to moving Luka, and I'll tell you why. Oh, my God. 好，讓我說說我會怎麼做。如果我是湖人，我會認真考慮交易 Luka，我告訴你為什麼。 Rich: Oh my god 我的天啊 Max: If you believe there's a redundancy, Austin and Luka, Luka's a better player than Austin Reaves. I understand that. Luka's a fantastic player, offensively. But if you want to win a championship, I believe that your best player needs to be someone who is willing to at least play team defense, like Steph Curry, bad defender. Steph's a bad defender, but he is a willing defender. It's not his fault he's not good at it. He's just built that way, whatever. But he's a great offensive player, not a great defensive player, but he's a willing team defender, so the Warriors can field championship teams. If your best player isn't that, very hard to win a championship. 如果你認為 Austin 和Luka功能重疊，雖然我明白 Luka 是比 Austin 更好的球員，他的 進攻完美。但若你想贏得總冠軍，我認為球隊最好的球員至少得願意參與「團隊防守」。 像是Curry，他防守不好，但他願意防，守不好不是他的錯，體型就那樣。但正因為他願 意參與防守，勇士才能打造奪冠陣容。如果你最強的球員不願意防守，那很難奪冠。 There is a world in which, if you're really trying to win a championship and you're the Lakers, you go, I can get X Luka and Austin are redundant. I can get X for Austin. I can get three X for Luka. You might consider moving Luka. This is me saying it. But do you agree with that, Rich? 所以在某些情況下，如果你是湖人且真的想奪冠，你會想：Luka 和 Austin 功能重疊。 賣掉 Austin 我可以換到 X 籌碼，但賣掉 Luka 我可以換到 3倍的X籌碼。 你可能會考慮動Luka，這些話是我說的，但Rich，你同意嗎？ Rich: Here's what I will say. I will say this, and this is complementary to AR. If you were sitting here and you said, Rich, you take this one, I'll take that one. I'm not saying they're equal players, but what I am saying is, howev er you want me to start to then build the rest of my team, I'm fine either way 我會這樣說，這對 AR來說是一種稱讚。如果你坐在這裡對我說： 「Rich，這兩個人你選一個，另一個給我。」我不是說這兩個人等級相等， 但我想表達的是：不管你要我用誰作為起點，來建立我剩下的陣容，我兩個都可以接受。 Max: With Luka or Austin, in other words, you have to choose one because they're redundant. 換句話說，因為他們功能重疊，你必須在 Luka 或 Austin 之間選一個。 Rich: All I'm saying is, I can build a team either way. Now, for the people that want to talk about, that want to play fantasy basketball, I'm not playing fantasy basketball. We're talking about hypotheticals. This does not mean you want somebody to be traded and there's some insider information in the locker room and this is not a LeBron thing. This is not any of that. But if you want to be educated in this case, then I think I fit the bill to educate you. 我只是說：不管選哪個，我都能組出一支球隊。 至於那些想要聊、想要玩fantasy basketball的人——我不是在玩fantasy basketball。 我們只是在談假設情境。這不代表你真的想把誰交易掉、也不代表更衣室裡有什麼內線消 息，更不是什麼「LeBron 的意思」。都不是那回事。 但如果你在這種情境下想受點教育，那我覺得我很符合資格來「教育你」。 備註 原來是因為Luka不願意防守 但皇帝就沒有這個問題XD -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.248.231.167 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://webptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1768451032.A.E2F.html ※ 編輯: usnavyseal (111.248.231.167 臺灣), 01/15/2026 12:24:18 ※ 編輯: usnavyseal (111.248.231.167 臺灣), 01/15/2026 12:27:59